‘It is an oath to our country’: Democratic Socialists, if elected, to be confronted with … the Constitution

There are a number of Democrat Socialist political candidates running in this year’s congressional midterms.

A far-left offshoot of the already leftist Democrat Party, they have openly advocated for their version of Marxism, or communism, even if they don’t label it that.

Some have proposed extremist, in fact revolutionary, schemes like ridding the nation of the Supreme Court, or the Senate. They’ve talked about taking money from people, a lot of it. And taking ownership of entire industries. Their backgrounds include close links, if not actual support, for groups most would consider terrorist.

But any of those individuals who are elected are going to be confronted with the U.S. Constitution, according to an analysis at Fox News.

In fact, they must swear allegiance before they will be allowed to take office.

And that simple component of American elections has some wondering if there will be fallout.

The analysis explains, “Members-elect must swear an oath to uphold the Constitution before they can become full members of the House. At the beginning of a new Congress, that oath is typically taken en masse by all 435 members, led by the House speaker.”

However, there is discussion that any incoming member of Congress “can challenge another member-elect’s right to be sworn in, provided they have compiled evidence that that person would not uphold their oath.”

The result could be House-wide deliberations followed by a vote on whether that member-elect has a right to be sworn in, the analysis suggested.

The DSA platform, for starters, calls for scrapping the current U.S. Constitution and writing a new one.

Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas, suggested to Fox News Digital that he could invoke the additional questions.

“You cannot swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution while actively working to destroy it. The oath of office is not just words you say at a ceremony. It is a belief. It is an oath to our country and our fellow countrymen,” Self told Fox News Digital.

“The House has both the authority and the duty to ensure that anyone who takes that oath does so in good faith, without mental reservation or purpose of evasion. As DSA candidates and the Red-Green Alliance gain ground, we must enforce the Constitution as written or risk allowing people committed to replacing it to take seats of power under false pretenses.”

A review by the Center for Renewing America said a challenge to a member-elect’s fitness to take the oath of office can be followed by the House speaker asking them to step aside while the debate begins, the report said.

“The objecting member should place the documentary record before the House, and the House should debate whether that evidence establishes that the member-elect remains committed to destroying the constitutional order,” the center said.

Then a resolution would be brought up for a vote, establishing the newcomer’s “commitment to destroying the constitutional order.”

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has said such a narrative is not likely to be adopted.

The analysis noted a 1969 case before the Supreme Court said the House cannot exclude an elected candidate from being sworn in if they otherwise meet the constitutional requirements of age, residency, and U.S. citizenship.

Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is currently a news editor for the WND News Center, and also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. Read more of Bob Unruh's articles here.


Leave a Comment